Because the KPI model utilizes conference-only results, the first KPI rankings will not be released until after several conference contests have been played in each sport. The first KPI for men’s and women’s soccer were published on Monday, Oct. 2 with women’s volleyball to be published for the first time on Monday, Oct. 9. The release dates for men’s and women’s basketball and softball will be determined at a later date.
A key ingredient in the KPI rankings, much like the NCAA’s March Madness at the Division I level, will be strength of schedule and significant wins on the road. It’s very possible that a third-place team in one division might be seeded higher than a champion in another division.
Hicks is fully supportive of the new KPI partnership.
“I think it’s outstanding! I credit the conference staff for being willing to do what we are doing, and that the Presidents and ADs are on board with it. I also think our students are becoming much more analytical and will be interested in following the periodic updates.”
And as coaches, student-athletes and fans become more knowledgeable about how KPI works, Hicks believes it will only add to the importance of certain games.
“There’s no doubt it’s going to add more value to some games. If King plays Converse on the road, everyone will know that it could have a greater impact on our seeding because of the strength of schedule.”
As UNC Pembroke’s athletic chief, Christy has a unique perspective on Conference Carolinas implementing a computerized seeding system.
“I’ve had the benefit of working with KPI in the past because of some of the NCAA committees I’ve sat on,” he said. “It’s been amazing to see how accurate the rankings are and how those teams have fared in the postseason field.”
While the division championship is another goal now for schools and student-athletes to shoot for presently, Christy is all in favor of giving the conference the chance to send its best representative teams to the national playoffs.
“I have a lot of confidence in KPI,” he added. “When one pod is stronger than the other, a second- or third-place team might be rated above a champion in another pod, and the seeding should reflect that.”
At a time where there is a seismic shift in NCAA Division I power conferences, with most Pac-12 schools departing for conferences in the Midwest and Eastern time zones, there’s a hint of irony that a smaller Division II conference in the Southeast is moving towards more regionalization and easier travel for its student-athletes.